By Arthur Brown
Sitting on the fence is not always the most comfortable place to be. In trying to avoid aligning yourself with a particular group, belief or political party, it is often easy to alienate yourself from all parties in the debate, thus potentially becoming irrelevant. I was recently asked by a new group of friends which Lebanese political party I followed, and told I would be welcome to join with them in their allegiance. Playing the ‘dumb foreigner’ card was helpful for me, however it’s not always that easy.
So, which side are you on? March 8 or March 14 [for those following Lebanese politics!]? The side of the Israeli or the Palestinian? Assad or The FSA [or another other Syrian opposition group]? Republican or Democrat? Labour or Conservative? Maybe these questions are not at all helpful, despite the fact that we probably have some opinion on many of them.
Maybe a more important question is how you decide to be on a particular ‘side’ and what being on that ‘side’ represents, both to you and to others. Do we simply follow the ‘party line’ on all issues? Do we unquestioningly accept what a particular media outlet feeds us? Does aligning yourself with a certain group necessarily require whole-hearted allegiance to all their values and beliefs in an unquestioning manner? All to often it seems that we are happy to label either ourselves, or others, and as a result assign them to a particular bounded catagory. It strikes me that this approach is simplistic, uncritical and ultimately leads to further conflict within any given context, as being ‘with this group’ means being ‘against that group’. Surely there must be another way.
Or, how about this question… Whose side is God on?
Now wait a minute you might be thinking…… God doesn’t take sides?…… Does He?…….Really?
We’ll come back to that question in a moment or two.
Whether or not we believe God actually takes sides or not, the reality is that many of us claim God’s support for our own views, be they political, social or religious. Sociologist Emile Durkheim suggests that people often worship little more than a symbolic representation of their own traits and values, and as a result essentially end up worshiping themselves and their selfish convictions. Our views on particular issues have the potential to become idols, as we seek God’s divine approval. In a sense our ‘religion’ potentially becomes a useful hatstand on which we hang our political views. The two become almost indistinguishable and God becomes, in the words of Miroslav Volf, a marker of identity rather than a maker of identity.[1]
Abraham Lincoln famously said, “My concern is not whether God is on our side: my greatest concern is to be on God’s side.” Easy words we might say, and given the deeply divided context into which he spoke, we would be right. Also dangerous, if understood to mean that those ‘not on God’s side’ may be treated in a way at odds with His divine nature and character. However, given our present reality, fraught with one side seeking power over another, maybe they are words we might do well to reflect on.
So, does God take sides? And if He does, does He takes sides in specific conflicts or political debates? Does a God who does not ‘take sides’ become irrelevant in the debate? And, if we are convinced that Lincoln has a point, how do we determine which side God is on, and join in with Him, in a way that honours Him in our treatment of the other?
Unlike the power struggles that are all too common in our part of the world, maybe those of us who claim to follow Jesus, need to get to know Him and what He stands for, prior to taking any side, in any conflict or debate. And maybe, in this search for, dare I say, the real Jesus, we will find someone less interested in ‘winning’ in the conventional way, a way that tends to seek dominance over the other, typically through violence or the threat of violence, or sanctions that harm those already most vulnerable. Instead we will will find the Jesus who takes sides with those on the margins, the weak, the displaced, the poor, and the poor in spirit. However, in taking sides with these, He refuses to become part of the vicious cycle of hate and retaliation.
Mother Theresa always talked about seeing the face of God in those she served. Regardless of which ‘side’ someone may be on, the truth remains that they are still created in the image of God, and therefore to be ascribed with dignity and value. In our ‘side taking’ may we never loose sight of the face of God in those we oppose.
[1] Miroslav Volf Allah: A Christian Response (New York: Harper Collins, 2011), p.191.
1 Comment
This is, in my opinion, one of the greatest pitfalls for Christians as we seek to be light to the world around us. We may at once be criticized for taking a side, or criticized for not taking one when there is an issue of great importance at hand. Sometimes the very act of not choosing a side is to choose one (the more powerful one) by default.
A very common question that I am asked is which side I favor in the Civil War in Syria. My answer is generally that I favor the side that is handing out food and blankets and helping people.
As Christians our “neutrality” must not be a passive one. We must actively seek out conflict and engage with a message of hope. The problems of the world will not be solved with more bullets or missiles, but rather with the love of our Lord Jesus and a hand reaching out to those in need. Both “sides” should be scandalized by our determination to look past their divisions and seek a better path.
When we confine ourselves to taking one side or the other, we buy into both the good and bad of that side. When we take no side we are seen as apathetic, because to some degree we are. Being always on the side of our Lord Jesus, doing what he would do, actively entering the conflict with his message, is how we shine his light into the darkest places.